doubles
I was so happy that the thread was alive again, that I decided to make a bunch of doubles. All are from image made in the last 10 days.
Comments, as usual, are very welcome and much appreciated.
posted by ursula @ 8:26 PM
2 comments
2 Comments:
Well all three of these work well for me, though I'm most fond of the bottom one. I think it's a matter of color though, and not subject or technique.
It's interesting that you asked the question on the last one as to whether or not these need to tell a store. I like all three of these, but I have a harder time convincing myself they are impressionistic. That may be because, to me, they don't really extrapolate something about the "object" that I personally see more when I see something with a motion blur. But I think by at least FP's definition, it's impressionistic if it carries your impressions!
The bottom one is great!
Post a Comment
<< Home